RADICS Peter wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 17, 2000 at 01:02:44PM -0700, Matthew Braithwaite wrote:
> > Sure -- Karl's statement that -d does in fact cause confusion is absolutely
> > sufficient reason to change it. Until this moment I had no idea that there
> How about using -R for repository (instead of -d as in CVS). -r is used
> a lot in CVS, so changing that is not a good idea, but -R is almost
> never used, since it's the same as the default behaviour (recursive).
OK. I confess. I already did that for my fluff-man proposal
that is coming out RSN. So, it is not really a completely faithful
copy of the CVS options. :-). Just mostly so because there are
almost 170 options specified for CVS. But then, I haven't recounted
after combining most of the duplicates. And there are still a few
more to combine, too. Fluffman will consist of only unique options.
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:11 2006