Re: DTD changed a bit

Branko ?ibej wrote:

> > OK, we have no formal DTD for the XML which "drives" our editor
> > callbacks, but ...
> Well then, perhaps we should have one. I'm no XML expert, so this is an
> ideal opportunity for me to start learning about XML DTDs, hehe. Here
> goes ...

A DTD is most useful if the XML is parsed by a validating parser.
Otherwise, the DTD and the XML will gradually drift apart.

I assume expat-lite is nonvalidating...

-- 
                                        K<bob>
kbob_at_jogger-egg.com, http://www.jogger-egg.com/