[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: progress of Subversion autoconfiscation

From: Greg Stein <gstein_at_lyra.org>
Date: 2000-07-16 23:59:41 CEST

On Sun, Jul 16, 2000 at 02:28:15PM -0700, Jon Stevens wrote:
> on 7/16/2000 2:05 PM, "Greg Stein" <gstein@lyra.org> wrote:
>
> > Ah. But if FreeBSD doesn't have a very good JVM (as I've seen you remark on
> > before :-), then FreeBSD people will probably not be installing JServ all
> > that often.
> >
> > Conversely, if there was a great JVM and people wanted to use it, then you
> > might hear more complaints about the GNU make requirement. :-)
>
> Sorry, but GNU make doesn't really compare to a JVM.

Huh? I meant that they won't notice the make requirement if they never even
try to install JServ (since they don't have a good JVM on the platform to
use with JServ).

I mean... duh :-) I know make != JVM. *snicker*

> > And isn't JServ being replaced by Tomcat anyways, which would reduce the
> > number of people wanting to install it?
>
> Believe it or not, there are still tons of people using JServ. A lot of
> people don't want to try to fix something on their site that isn't broken.
> :-)

Oh, quite true. But let us say that people are starting from scratch.
They've got neither JServ nor Tomcat. So they pick one. Don't they usually
pick Tomcat? Or let's say they pick JServ, smack the make requirement and
move on to Tomcat without sending in a complain about the make req't.

Of course, if they *already* have JServ, then they already have GNU make
installed.

Cheers,
-g

-- 
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:05 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.