[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: SVN database is a lot bigger than PVCS database

From: Mark Phippard <markphip_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 08:37:57 -0400

On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 8:19 AM, Seak, T. F.<lapsap7+svn_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> A workmate of mine has done a migration of our PVCS to SVN.  He used the svn-importer-1.1-M8.zip to do it and chose VisualSVN Server
>
> In PVCS, our projects database took up about 4.7GB.  But SVN database now takes up more than
> 25GB of disk space!
>
> What's the cause of such "explosion"?

I'd guess it is the importer. It probably did not create branches and
tags by copying.

> Is that because of the import tool?  Or because of VisualSVN?  If I understand it correctly,
> VisualSVN isn't a product of Tigris.  What is the "official" SVN server made by Tigris and runs in
> Windows?  Do you think if the "official" SVN server would use less disk space?

I do not think VisualSVN is a factor. That is still "Subversion".

-- 
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1065&dsMessageId=2374419
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org].
Received on 2009-07-22 14:38:47 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.