[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: duplicate checking limit and search algorithm

From: <kfogel_at_collab.net>
Date: 2005-04-18 22:21:49 CEST

Wrong list, I think you wanted the scarab list. :-)

Ben Garrison <bgarrison@Intrado.com> writes:
> Is there currently a hard limit on duplicate checking results?
>
> I am using the scarab a20 release. I'm initially testing on a Fedora
> Core 3 box and the target deployment platform will be RedHat Advanced
> Server 4.
>
> If I define a field to check for duplicates and then enter a defect I
> can see no more than 26 possible duplicate matches. They appear in
> sequential order, oldest defects first. In addition, the algorithm
> appears to be doing an "OR" with the key words entered (instead of an
> "AND") thus returning more results for more key words. This means that
> the more items there are in the system and the more keywords included in
> the field, the wider the result set (which is then truncated).
>
> Is there a way to change the algorithm to "AND" the keywords? What
> about increasing the limit on the results list?
>
> Thanks in advance for any help.
>
> Ben
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Apr 18 22:52:36 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.