RE: Why doesn't "users" have a "Reply-To" header back to the list?

There was a thread around 5/27 "[OT] svn-user Reply To Header was Re: repositories and backups..." but nothing conclusive. I think that John Peacock summed it up with

>Patrick Burleson wrote:
>> Was this a decision made early on? Can it be changed? It seems to me
>> that most mailing lists have it setup that hitting reply composes a
>> reply back to the list.

>That's not my experience. See also:

>http://cr.yp.to/proto/replyto.html
>http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html

>NOTE: for this message I hit ReplyAll then deleted your (Patrick) e-mail
>address. Works fine. Some people who find that the dupe messages bother them
>overly much run software to either: 1) eliminate dupes based on message-id, or
>2) bounce messages which reference both their own address and an address of a
>list they are a member of.

-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Valdemar Mørch [mailto:swp5jhu02@sneakemail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 5:41 PM
To: users@subversion.tigris.org
Subject: Why doesn't "users" have a "Reply-To" header back to the list?

Hi,

I was just curious what the reason is. There was an old thread,

"users" list is removing "Reply-To" header

But when I try to go back to Karl's original posting, I get a "Fatal
servlet error"

So what is the rationale behind why postings to the list don't have a
Reply-To: users@subversion.tigris.org
header line? It seems to be on purpose... I almost always am just about
to reply to somebody off-list...

Peter

-- 
Peter Valdemar Mørch
http://www.morch.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org