Mark Phippard wrote:
> I am not suggesting any magic spells, I am suggesting that the user would
> take the unlock option and there would be a check box of some kind to
> enable the --force option on svn unlock.
>
> When svn lock fails, the error message could indicate that the user might
> be able to remove the other user's lock via the unlock option, with the
> sort of disclaimers you suggested added.
>
> All I am saying is that you should not be able to proactively say you want
> to steal the lock as part of the initial lock request.
Ah, ok. I agree with the above.
> There have been
> good ideas suggested as to how the UI might lead them through the steal
> process when the error occurs.
Oh. Good. Not sure if you're thinking of a specific suggestion or not...
> I just think adding that UI is overkill for release 1 of the feature when we are
> already adding an unlock option that is capable of doing it.
So you think that the feature should be left out of the TSVN GUI
because the CL client supports it already, and power users should go
there to do the job? I don't know. I'd much prefer that TSVN also
support it. As it is right now, I can actually do all my work without
even resorting to the CL client. I like that.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
Received on Sun Apr 10 03:07:48 2005