Oh, I did not know that subclipse 1.0.x works in eclipse 3.2.x.
That clears everything.
Regards,
David
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Phippard [mailto:markphip_at_gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2008 2:49 PM
> To: users_at_subclipse.tigris.org
> Subject: Re: [Subclipse-users] 1.0.x download broken ?
>
> On Jan 23, 2008 8:33 AM, David Balazic
> <David.Balazic_at_hermes-softlab.com> wrote:
> > I am confused.
> > Why would anyone using eclipse 3.1.x and subclipse 1.0.x
> > want to upgrade subclipse to 1.2.x when that wont work
> > with Eclipse 3.1.x ?
>
> We have no way to know what version of Eclipse someone is using. When
> the update site was changed, Eclipse 3.2 had only recently come out
> and it was highly likely that users were using Subclipse 1.0.x in
> Eclipse 3.2. This gave them an opportunity to upgrade.
>
> For some reason the check for updates process is smart enough to show
> you the right version based on your installed Eclipse but the initial
> installation is not. In other words, someone in Eclipse 3.1 with an
> older version of Subclipse 1.0.x installed would see the latest 1.0
> version as an update. Someone in Eclipse 3.2 will see 1.2 offered as
> an update.
>
> --
> Thanks
>
> Mark Phippard
> http://markphip.blogspot.com/
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_subclipse.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_subclipse.tigris.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_subclipse.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_subclipse.tigris.org
Received on 2008-01-23 15:48:18 CET