I believe they are paying a lot for a commercial license. Probably from IBM.
On Dec 25, 2007 3:20 PM, Mark Phippard <markphip@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Dec 25, 2007 8:16 AM, Oded Shopen <odedia@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Any thoughts on changing the licensing terms of Subclipse?
> >
> > A very large organization I work for approved SubVersion legally, but
> not
> > Subclipse due to the restrictions in the licensing terms. It's really a
> > shame, because it's a great product...
>
> Subclipse uses the EPL, the same license as Eclipse. How could they
> approve the use of Eclipse and not Subclipse?
>
> --
> Thanks
>
> Mark Phippard
> http://markphip.blogspot.com/
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subclipse.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subclipse.tigris.org
>
>
Received on Tue Dec 25 15:45:27 2007