[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: should we really ship serf as default for 1.7? (was: Re: serf and sourceforge.net don't get along)

From: <kmradke_at_rockwellcollins.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 11:10:07 -0500

Ivan Zhakov <ivan_at_visualsvn.com> wrote on 06/24/2011 10:46:37 AM:
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 17:48, <kmradke_at_rockwellcollins.com> wrote:
> >
> > Is anybody using serf with negotiate authentication? I can't get it
to
> > work with a 1.6.5 server using mod_auth_kerb and negotiate.
> >
> > The server sends the 401:
> >
> > WWW-Authenticate: Negotiate
> > WWW-Authenticate: Basic realm="my realm"
> >
> > correctly, but serf just keeps re-sending the same original
> > unauthenticated
> > request. Works fine if negotiate is removed, and works fine either
way
> > when switched to use neon.
> >
> > I tested with the collabnet 1.7.0-dev build r1136035. User agent
shows:
> > SVN/1.7.0-dev serf/0.8.0
> >
> It seems to be different kind of serf issue 77:
> http://code.google.com/p/serf/issues/detail?id=77

Ugh. Didn't notice that one before I created #80. Behavior is similar,
and
I can help by looking at fiddler2 traces. I wasn't seeing any
challenges being sent back from serf, so the low level details seem
different.

Kevin R.
Received on 2011-06-24 18:10:41 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.