Re: should we really ship serf as default for 1.7? (was: Re: serf and sourceforge.net don't get along)

From: Stefan Sperling <stsp_at_elego.de>
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 17:56:59 +0200

On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 07:50:15PM +0400, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> I've tested
> Negotiate (Kerberos) authentication in TortoiseSVN using serf in our
> environment and it works in simple cases.

So... what happens in complex cases? :)

Are there cases which neon can handle that serf cannot?
Received on 2011-06-24 17:57:40 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: kmradke_at_rockwellcollins.com: "Re: should we really ship serf as default for 1.7? (was: Re: serf and sourceforge.net don't get along)"
Previous message: Mark Phippard: "Re: should we really ship serf as default for 1.7? (was: Re: serf and sourceforge.net don't get along)"
In reply to: Ivan Zhakov: "Re: should we really ship serf as default for 1.7? (was: Re: serf and sourceforge.net don't get along)"
Next in thread: Ivan Zhakov: "Re: should we really ship serf as default for 1.7? (was: Re: serf and sourceforge.net don't get along)"
Reply: Ivan Zhakov: "Re: should we really ship serf as default for 1.7? (was: Re: serf and sourceforge.net don't get along)"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]