Re: [PATCH] Update HACKING: Mutual respect / Evaluate the code, not the coder.

On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 21:12, Jack Repenning <jrepenning_at_collab.net> wrote:
> On Apr 15, 2009, at 10:43 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
>
>> Stefan Sperling ran into a problem where the ML software munged his
>> patch. Basically, it *rewrote* the message into something that was
>> *incorrect*. It said "quoted-printable", but the content was wrong.
>
> I'm aware of quoted-printable botches over the message *body*, including
> bodies that stupidly get converted to attachments, but not for things that
> start out as attachments. I've worked some of the former cases with Stefan.
> Can you link me to an example of the latter?

Sorry... thought I mentioned the patch was *inline* ... it was not
munging an attachment.

>> Oh. And I'm still waiting to see a solution to correct the "this
>> message has been converted to an attachment". I thought you said that
>> was solved by making the message delivery a passthru, and the
>> conversion would only happen for he web UI. What happened to that?
>
> Still in the pipeline.

Thanks.

>...

Cheers,
-g

------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=1732165
Received on 2009-04-15 22:23:58 CEST