On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 11:52 AM, Julian Foad
> On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 08:57 -0600, Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
>> Hi all, just another mail to check up on the status of the 1.6.x blocking
>> issues. TODO-1.6 hasn't changed that much over the last couple of weeks, but I
>> think we've made some progress toward the issues presented. They are:
>> * #3334: Tree conflicts "merry-go-round" about update updating the base.
>> Julian Foad is working on this. Done for when victim is a file, still
>> doing for when victim is a directory. [julianfoad]
>> * #3354: update fails when file with local mods is moved and modified.
>> The bug has been fixed, but the regression test for the issue seems
>> to have problems.
There was a problem with the test on some platforms which was fixed in
r35322. Now this test is failing for reasons 'legitimately' related
to issue #3354.
>> * Review the new "svn_dirent/svn_uri" API and ensure we aren't putting
>> functions into the public name space that we won't want to support.
>> I know that Julian continues to work on issue #3334, do we know what work is left?
> I believe I've got it doing basically the right thing on the
> issue-3334-dirs branch. I have some test failures that I'm working
> through; some may be changed expectations and others may be bugs:
> FAIL: update_tests.py 7: update that deletes modified files
> FAIL: update_tests.py 47: tree conflicts on update 1.2
> FAIL: update_tests.py 48: tree conflicts on update 2.1
> FAIL: update_tests.py 49: tree conflicts on update 2.2
> FAIL: update_tests.py 51: tree conflicts on update 3
> FAIL: switch_tests.py 32: tree conflicts on switch 1.2
> FAIL: switch_tests.py 33: tree conflicts on switch 2.1
> FAIL: switch_tests.py 34: tree conflicts on switch 2.2
> FAIL: switch_tests.py 35: tree conflicts on switch 3
> FAIL: revert_tests.py 19: revert tree conflicts in updated files
> FAIL: stat_tests.py 31: status with tree conflicts
> - Julian
Received on 2009-01-20 17:53:43 CET