On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 11:52 AM, Julian Foad
<julianfoad_at_btopenworld.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 08:57 -0600, Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
>> Hi all, just another mail to check up on the status of the 1.6.x blocking
>> issues. TODO-1.6 hasn't changed that much over the last couple of weeks, but I
>> think we've made some progress toward the issues presented. They are:
>>
>> * #3334: Tree conflicts "merry-go-round" about update updating the base.
>> Julian Foad is working on this. Done for when victim is a file, still
>> doing for when victim is a directory. [julianfoad]
>> See:
>> <http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=1019712>.
>>
>> * #3354: update fails when file with local mods is moved and modified.
>> The bug has been fixed, but the regression test for the issue seems
>> to have problems.
>>
>> * Review the new "svn_dirent/svn_uri" API and ensure we aren't putting
>> functions into the public name space that we won't want to support.
>> See
>> <http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=1010183>.
>>
>> I know that Julian continues to work on issue #3334, do we know what work is left?
>
> I believe I've got it doing basically the right thing on the
> issue-3334-dirs branch. I have some test failures that I'm working
> through; some may be changed expectations and others may be bugs:
>
> FAIL: update_tests.py 7: update that deletes modified files
> FAIL: update_tests.py 47: tree conflicts on update 1.2
> FAIL: update_tests.py 48: tree conflicts on update 2.1
> FAIL: update_tests.py 49: tree conflicts on update 2.2
> FAIL: update_tests.py 51: tree conflicts on update 3
> FAIL: switch_tests.py 32: tree conflicts on switch 1.2
> FAIL: switch_tests.py 33: tree conflicts on switch 2.1
> FAIL: switch_tests.py 34: tree conflicts on switch 2.2
> FAIL: switch_tests.py 35: tree conflicts on switch 3
> FAIL: revert_tests.py 19: revert tree conflicts in updated files
> FAIL: stat_tests.py 31: status with tree conflicts
What do we see as the general release plan? I am assuming that once
these issues are wrapped up, buildbot is all green etc., that we will
make the branch and move directly to RC1?
If these issues are wrapped up this week do we plan to do this next week?
I just want to be able to prepare resources on my end. We (CollabNet)
plan to make binaries available as we did for 1.5 to help get as many
testers as possible.
--
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=1038314
Received on 2009-01-20 17:32:12 CET