Re: svn trunk r15103: FAIL (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu shared ra_local bdb)

"Peter N. Lundblad" <peter@famlundblad.se> writes:
> Yes, the old code did svn_io_check_path before. That was the "stat" I
> eliminated in this function.
>
> > versioned, so it didn't see SVN_ERR_ENTRY_NOT_FOUND if the file did
> > not exist and returned no error. If the file was unversioned but did
> > exist then I think SVN_ERR_ENTRY_NOT_FOUND was returned. The
> > libsvn_wc code is so complicated it's not clear whether this was
> > accidental or deliberate, and it's not clear whether that exact
>
> OK. I didn't think of that case. I'll commit the patch above tommorrow if
> you don't.

Can you make sure to leave a comment explaining why the check is
necessary, so we don't do this again? :-)

-K

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Jun 20 05:06:22 2005