Ben Collins-Sussman <sussman@collab.net> writes:
> I'm not sure why maxb's argument is such a big deal. We already have
> a strategy for the scenario he describes -- we use it already in all
> of our history-tracing peg-rev stuff in svn 1.1.
>
> For example, if I run 'svn cat -r 50 foo.c@HEAD', we're already
> checking that foo.c in HEAD is the same object as foo.c in r50. If
> not, we throw an error. I don't see why 'svn log' couldn't do the
> same sanity check.
I think maxb proposed exactly that, in fact...
Want to file the issue, then? :-)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Jan 5 23:39:47 2005