Re: svn log hides log messages

Ben Collins-Sussman wrote [01/05/05 2:27 PM]:
>
> Well, you've just presented one side of the debate that's been going on
> forever on this list. The other side of the debate is:
> "If no target is given, then all svn subcommands default to operating on
> '.' at its BASE revision." It's a consistency argument.

> See the thread started by kfogel on this last week.

Yes, I have, thanks.

(In response to Karl's last post):

It sounds to me like you guys are trying to find a way to make it work
and still thinking through all the implications.

Thanks for listening, and for these excellent tools.

-- 
________________
harrison@tbc.net
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org