[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: EWOULDBLOCK on win32

From: Branko Čibej <brane_at_xbc.nu>
Date: 2004-08-04 12:23:57 CEST

C. Michael Pilato wrote:

>Ben Collins-Sussman <sussman@collab.net> writes:
>
>
>
>>On Mon, 2004-08-02 at 20:27, mbk@tigris.org wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Author: mbk
>>>Date: Mon Aug 2 20:27:19 2004
>>>New Revision: 10467
>>>
>>>Modified:
>>> trunk/subversion/include/svn_io.h
>>> trunk/subversion/include/svn_repos.h
>>> trunk/subversion/libsvn_repos/repos.c
>>> trunk/subversion/libsvn_subr/io.c
>>> trunk/subversion/svnadmin/main.c
>>>Log:
>>>Make "svnadmin recover" more user-friendly by printing a warning
>>>if the repository appears to be locked.
>>>
>>>
>>>- SVN_ERR_W (svn_io_file_lock (lockfile_path, exclusive, pool),
>>>- "Error opening db lockfile");
>>>+ err = svn_io_file_lock2 (lockfile_path, exclusive, nonblocking, pool);
>>>+ if (err != NULL && err->apr_err == EWOULDBLOCK)
>>>
>>>
>>I'm setting up a nightly-build batch script on WinXP/VC6 system right
>>now. The script just updated my /trunk working copy, ran gen-make.py,
>>msdev, and poof... it tells me that 'EWOuLDBLOCK' is an undeclared
>>identifier.
>>
>>
>
>I wonder if our code shouldn't be using the APR_STATUS_IS_EAGAIN()
>macro instead of testing EWOULDBLOCK directly? See apr_errno.h.
>
>
Yes it should. Checking any kind of error code that doesn't start with
APR_ is wrong anyway.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Aug 4 12:24:23 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.