Re: process for including changes in 1.0

Garrett Rooney <rooneg@electricjellyfish.net> writes:
> For the record, I prefer a STATUS file, I think it's hugely easier to
> use than the issue tracker for this kind of thing.

:-)

Yup, I knew it wasn't unanimous either way. (Heck, I disagreed even
with myself.) The thing that swung it for me was the realization that

   a) This doesn't have to be a permanent decision, we're free to
      change if it doesn't work, and

   b) Since we can change, we should first try the solution that
      doesn't require the creation of a new object (the STATUS file)

Let's see what happens. The information being recorded is the same
either way, it's not like we could lose ground at any point.

-K

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Dec 16 01:30:30 2003