[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: process for including changes in 1.0

From: Garrett Rooney <rooneg_at_electricjellyfish.net>
Date: 2003-12-16 01:09:45 CET

On Dec 15, 2003, at 5:28 PM, kfogel@collab.net wrote:

> Ben Reser <ben@reser.org> writes:
>> Maybe the issue tracker should have some sort of voting system added
>> to
>> it? Obviously doesn't help us now. Mandrake added such a thing for
>> its bugzilla and it's pretty handy.
>
> Funny you should mention that. I'm sitting here looking at my issues
> summary, and realizing that the Status field is actually not a bad
> place for this. We've only used it for effort estimates up till now,
> but it could hold vote totals.
>
> Everything else about an issue summary is perfect for the task: we've
> got the P number, the milestone ("1.0" in this case, with option to
> move to "1.2" or "Post-1.0" if the votes don't reach the threshold).
> Maybe I'm wrong, and this isn't so much less convenient than a text
> file.
>
> Well, what the heck. It seems most people prefer the issue-based
> solution, or are at least okay with it; I'm the one being picky here.
> Let's try using the issue tracker and see if it works. If it's too
> painful to be borne, we'll notice pretty quickly.

For the record, I prefer a STATUS file, I think it's hugely easier to
use than the issue tracker for this kind of thing.

-garrett

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Dec 16 01:10:15 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.