[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Checkpoint less frequently

From: Glenn A. Thompson <gthompson_at_cdr.net>
Date: 2003-02-21 09:02:37 CET

Hey,

>Honestly, I'm with Justin here. If it were just me making the
>decisions, I'd say that the point at which we need a monitor process is
>the point at which we should give up on using Berkeley DB, however
>painful that might be at this stage of the game. (Perhaps more
>realistically, we could try to produce a change to Berkeley DB which
>would make it actually work, and convince Sleepycat to adopt it.) I'm
>tired of passing our design errors on to the user.
>
>
I'm for looking at BDB. However, in their defense, it's an embedded DB.
 They fully expect the linker to deal with these sorts of things. The
data layer should be in it's own process space. Gat awaits the arrows:-)

gat

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Feb 21 09:03:16 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.