Re: Checkpoint less frequently

On Fri, 2003-02-21 at 01:50, Branko Čibej wrote:
> The BDB docs recommend having a server or monitor process that runs
> recovery when necessary.

I tried hunting down this reference (I've seen it before) and failed.
If you could find it, I'd appreciate it.

Honestly, I'm with Justin here. If it were just me making the
decisions, I'd say that the point at which we need a monitor process is
the point at which we should give up on using Berkeley DB, however
painful that might be at this stage of the game. (Perhaps more
realistically, we could try to produce a change to Berkeley DB which
would make it actually work, and convince Sleepycat to adopt it.) I'm
tired of passing our design errors on to the user.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Feb 21 08:52:59 2003