[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

dso alternative

From: Ben Collins-Sussman <sussman_at_newton.collab.net>
Date: 2000-12-13 20:19:02 CET

Or, perhaps this whole idea of "sharing" already-loaded RA libraries
is silly. Each process, when it needs an RA library, can just
explicitly load it and keep a private copy of the vtable.

I mean, don't modern operating systems just cache libraries once
they're loaded? Don't they *expect* your processes to be sloppy and
self-involved?
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:17 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.