On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 08:50:00AM +0100, Thorsten Schöning wrote:
> Guten Tag Stefan Sperling,
> am Montag, 24. Februar 2020 um 21:04 schrieben Sie:
> > If several possible move targets exist, the 'svn' client will offer
> > 'd' and 'w' conflict options which may help you to set the right
> > destination paths.
> It did, thanks. That's what I had expected from TSVN as well. But do
> you really mean "w" or "m"? Because I have been offered "d" and "m"
> > Select: (p) Postpone, (r) Mark as resolved,
> > (m) Apply to move destination,
> > (d) Set repository move destination path, (h) Help,
> > (q) Quit resolution: d
> Just wondering if "w" is something I need to keep in mind
It depends on the particular situation. "w" only happens in case there
is more than one possible move target inside the working copy, which
also depends on the particular repository-side path selected with "d".
If the path selected with "d" maps to a single path in the working copy
then "w" is not needed.
> > This feature only works if the SVN client implements support for it.
> > If TSVN did not do that, then they are missing this feature.
> > I am not sure how far TortoiseSVN went with their resolver implementation.
> Am going to ask them, mabye I simply did something wrong or missed
> some setting or else.
Thanks! Perhaps this is indeed just missing in their UI.
Received on 2020-02-25 13:10:03 CET