[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: How to open specified inside .svn

From: Branko Čibej <brane_at_apache.org>
Date: Sat, 2 Mar 2019 15:45:57 +0100

On 02.03.2019 15:18, wuzhouhui wrote:
>> On Mar 2, 2019, at 10:09 PM, wuzhouhui <wuzhouhui14_at_mails.ucas.ac.cn> wrote:
>>
>>> On Mar 2, 2019, at 9:41 PM, Branko Čibej <brane_at_apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 02.03.2019 05:29, wuzhouhui wrote:
>>>>> On Mar 2, 2019, at 8:21 AM, Daniel Shahaf <d.s_at_daniel.shahaf.name> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> wuzhouhui wrote on Fri, Mar 01, 2019 at 17:46:55 +0800:
>>>>>>> -----Original Messages-----
>>>>>>> From: "Branko Čibej" <brane_at_apache.org>
>>>>>>> Sent Time: 2019-03-01 17:16:40 (Friday)
>>>>>>> To: users_at_subversion.apache.org
>>>>>>> Cc:
>>>>>>> Subject: Re: How to open specified inside .svn
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> There are no such generic functions. The svn_wc API isn't really meant
>>>>>>> to be public, so you'll have to write your own access functions. Look at
>>>>>>> how the svn_client implementations do it, or for example
>>>>>>> svn_wc__get_pristine_contents_by_checksum in svn_wc_private.h.
>>>>>> Actually, I'm hacking Subversion client command line tool, so it
>>>>>> doesn't matter whether the API is public or private.
>>>>> The difference isn't just visibility. We don't promise compatibility
>>>>> for private APIs, not even across patch releases in the same minor line
>>>>> (1.A.x and 1.A.y).
>>>> Thanks for your reminding. I have implement client side pre-commit hook.
>>>> The implementation maybe ugly, but it works at least.
>>>>
>>>> In case of someone have interests, you can find my customized Subversion
>>>> in https://github.com/wuzhouhui/subversion. Please forgive me about using
>>>> Git to version control Subversion :-)
>>>
>>> Using git is not a problem. Calling it Subversion _is_ a problem. Please
>>> rename it to something else.
> Ok, I understand your point. The "Subversion" is registered name of Apache, so
> I couldn't use this name casually.
>
> Thanks for your reminding.

Actually the possible confusion worries me more than the registered
trademark. Thanks for renaming it!

-- Brane

>
>> Calling it Subversion may confusing people (is it your concern?), rename it to
>> WuSVN. I hope this new name won't introduce any trouble.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>>> -- Brane
Received on 2019-03-02 15:46:13 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.