[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: using -F fails using bash process substitution. bug?

From: Daniel Shahaf <d.s_at_daniel.shahaf.name>
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2018 19:11:58 +0000

Philip Martin wrote on Thu, 19 Jul 2018 16:16 +0100:
> We might be able to fix the code that uses stat()
> by having it check for EOF as well.

I see you've now done this in r1836306. Any reason not to backport
that? (Feel free to add my +1)
Received on 2018-07-20 21:12:07 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Franz Sirl: "Re: Some files stay at an too new revision when updating the working copy to an old revision"
Previous message: Daniel Shahaf: "Re: using -F fails using bash process substitution. bug?"
In reply to: Philip Martin: "Re: using -F fails using bash process substitution. bug?"
Next in thread: Philip Martin: "Re: using -F fails using bash process substitution. bug?"
Reply: Philip Martin: "Re: using -F fails using bash process substitution. bug?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.