[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Subversion Server Replacement Query

From: Branko Čibej <brane_at_apache.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 11:32:48 +0200

On 20.09.2017 11:06, Saleh, Mai wrote:
>
> Hi Subversion Support,
>
>  
>
> Please advise as we need to move subversion from old server with OS
> RH5U3 to RH7U3, all of our repositories are hosted on NFS share.
>

Don't Do That

> SVN version on old server is 1.6.x and new server has version 1.9.7.
>
>  
>
> Plan is to rsync old shared area hosting repositories to new shared
> area and copy configuration files to the same path on new server. So
> repositories and configuration files will be in exact paths. Then we
> will rename new server with original server name.
>
>  
>
>  
>
> Initial test succeeded, but we need to know is there anything that we
> need to take care of,
>

Yes. Do not put your repositories on an NFS share. That is not
guaranteed to work correctly (because file renames over NFS are not atomic).

> do we have to use dump and load as that will take lots of time, due to
> history and size of repositories.
>

No, the 1.9 server can use repositories created by version 1.6, but you
will not get all the new features and performance enhancements; see:

http://subversion.apache.org/docs/release-notes/1.7.html#new-feature-compatibility-table
http://subversion.apache.org/docs/release-notes/1.8.html#new-feature-compatibility-table
http://subversion.apache.org/docs/release-notes/1.9.html#new-feature-compatibility-table

>  Do users need to create a new working copies?
>

No.

-- Brane
Received on 2017-09-20 11:32:55 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.