Re: "svn status" does not show unversioned items been deleted but not committed

Stefan Sperling <stsp_at_elego.de> писал(а) в своём письме Thu, 18 May 2017
15:52:17 +0300:

> On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 03:09:51PM +0300, Andrey wrote:
>> If i'll revert it then i'll LOSE CHANGES
>
> Of course. That is the entire point of this command.
>
> $ svn help revert
> revert: Restore pristine working copy state (undo local changes).
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> If that bothers you, then I would suggest you do not use it.
It looses changes of a file NOT RELATED TO UNDO. It is ANOTHER file just
missed to be add for commit instead of renamed one. Why the svn does
silently erase it just because of the name collision? It is definitely a
not good behavior for the svn.
Received on 2017-05-18 15:37:09 CEST