> First a couple questions to get our context right: what version of svn
> on the client and on the server?
> Is there a slow network between client and server, or are they on the
> same LAN?
svn --version
```
svn, version 1.9.5 (r1770682)
compiled Nov 26 2016, 14:22:31 on x86-microsoft-windows
...
The following repository access (RA) modules are available:
* ra_svn : Module for accessing a repository using the svn network
protocol.
- with Cyrus SASL authentication
- handles 'svn' scheme
* ra_local : Module for accessing a repository on local disk.
- handles 'file' scheme
* ra_serf : Module for accessing a repository via WebDAV protocol using
serf.
- using serf 1.3.9 (compiled with 1.3.9)
- handles 'http' scheme
- handles 'https' scheme
The following authentication credential caches are available:
* Wincrypt cache in C:\Users\Andry\AppData\Roaming\Subversion
```
svnadmin --version
```
$ svnadmin --version
svnadmin, version 1.9.5 (r1770682)
compiled Dec 1 2016, 14:48:33 on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
...
The following repository back-end (FS) modules are available:
* fs_fs : Module for working with a plain file (FSFS) repository.
* fs_x : Module for working with an experimental (FSX) repository.
* fs_base : Module for working with a Berkeley DB repository.
```
> Just as background: svn:externals definitions can also optionally take
> a peg revision (the @REV notation) [1], [2]. Maybe in the future you
> can use the peg revision syntax to avoid this problem of the "external
> source" disappearing at some point in history.
It's not mine repo to avoid such cases. Basically people use HEAD
revisions to
take last changes by one external reference at once (as a solution of
multiple projects).
I see nothing wrong with what.
Received on 2017-05-18 14:09:34 CEST