FWIW, I recently made the same decision for the packages we provide at
CollabNet. We have stopped providing 32-bit versions for all platforms.
Mark
On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 7:26 AM, Doug Robinson <doug.robinson_at_wandisco.com>
wrote:
> Alfred:
>
> You can blame me for the decision to prune out the 32-bit platform support
> from WANdisco.
>
> I can easily admit to being premature, but I'm finding less demand for
> 32-bit and really
> question why anyone would continue to run 32-bit at this time? If you
> could help me understand
> then perhaps I can reverse that decision...
>
> Thank you.
>
> Doug
>
> On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 10:21 AM, Alfred von Campe <alfred_at_von-campe.com>
> wrote:
>
>> We are not quite ready to move to CentOS 7 yet, but hopefully will soon.
>> However, I don’t understand why the dependencies are different for i686
>> and x86_64 on the same CentOS 6 platform for Subversion 1.9.X. Up to
>> version 1.9.4-1, WANdisco provided binaries for both architectures.
>>
>> Alfred
>>
>>
>> > On Apr 7, 2017, at 20:46, Nico Kadel-Garcia <nkadel_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 9:57 AM, Alfred von Campe <alfred_at_von-campe.com>
>> wrote:
>> >> Does anyone on this list have a pointer to a repo that hosts the
>> latest 32-bit (i686) Subversion binaries for RHEL 6? I’ve been using the
>> WANdisco SVN Repo 1.9 (http://opensource.wandisco.co
>> m/centos/6/svn-1.9/RPMS), but it only has version 1.9.5-1 for 64-bit
>> (x86_64). The latest 32-bit binaries in that repo are for version 1.9.4-1,
>> which are almost a year old.
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >> Alfred
>> >
>> > I tried, some time back, to publish SRPM building tools for
>> > subersion-1.9.x and 1.8.x over at https://github.com/nkadel/. I
>> > eventually had to throw in the towel as the component dependencies for
>> > compiling the latest Subversion exceeded my time to backport and
>> > provide separate, system compatible builds of various libraries. But
>> > you're welcome to poke them and take a shot at getting it to RHEL 6.
>> >
>> > I also admit that with RHEL 5 and CentOS 5 obsolete, CentOS 6 has also
>> > gotten quite long in the tooth. Can you update to CentOS 7?
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> *DOUGLAS B ROBINSON* SENIOR PRODUCT MANAGER
>
> T +1 925 396 1125
> *E* doug.robinson_at_wandisco.com
>
> World Leader in Active Data Replication™
> *Find out more wandisco.com <http://wandisco.com/>*
>
> THIS MESSAGE AND ANY ATTACHMENTS ARE CONFIDENTIAL, PROPRIETARY AND MAY BE
> PRIVILEGED
>
> If this message was misdirected, WANdisco, Inc. and its subsidiaries,
> ("WANdisco") does not waive any confidentiality or privilege. If you are
> not the intended recipient, please notify us immediately and destroy the
> message without disclosing its contents to anyone. Any distribution, use or
> copying of this email or the information it contains by other than an
> intended recipient is unauthorized. The views and opinions expressed in
> this email message are the author's own and may not reflect the views and
> opinions of WANdisco, unless the author is authorized by WANdisco to
> express such views or opinions on its behalf. All email sent to or from
> this address is subject to electronic storage and review by WANdisco.
> Although WANdisco operates anti-virus programs, it does not accept
> responsibility for any damage whatsoever caused by viruses being passed.
>
--
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
Received on 2017-04-11 14:29:56 CEST