[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Weird Behaviour: Files reverted that didn't show up in a status --no-ignore

From: <webster.brent_at_rogers.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2016 23:50:36 +0000 (UTC)

It was 1.8.14 client.
It just said "Reverted <filename>" and the subsequent "svn status" made no mention of the <filename>. ---- Brent

      From: Johan Corveleyn <jcorvel_at_gmail.com>
 To: webster.brent_at_rogers.com
Cc: "users_at_subversion.apache.org" <users_at_subversion.apache.org>
 Sent: Thursday, March 3, 2016 3:29 AM
 Subject: Re: Weird Behaviour: Files reverted that didn't show up in a status --no-ignore
   
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 9:53 PM,  <webster.brent_at_rogers.com> wrote:
> We are running VisualSVN 1.9.3 server on a Windows box and a user's
> workspace is on a Centos6.5 Linux box.
> He had just done a "svn update" and the build failed.  No conflicts as far
> as I can tell.  The "svn status" showed the build artifacts and his modified
> files.  As a suggestion, he would "svn revert -R ." all his changes.  During
> the revert, it showed numerous other SVN element(cpp & h) files being
> reverted that he never touched and the "svn status --no-ignore" never
> showed.  We tried reproducing it but no luck.
>
> I'm in the process of switching over a bunch of "old", hardened Clearcase
> folks to SVN so this little weirdness is never good to see.

Would still be unexpected / weird, but: is it possible that those
files were not really changed, but that 'revert' simply generated
unnecessary notifications (showing 'reverted file X' for files that
weren't really changed)?

You didn't mention the version of svn client. Maybe it's a
notification bug in the client that's already fixed?

-- 
Johan
  
Received on 2016-03-05 00:50:49 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.