> -----Original Message-----
> From: Johan Corveleyn [mailto:jcorvel_at_gmail.com]
> Sent: donderdag 3 maart 2016 09:30
> To: webster.brent_at_rogers.com
> Cc: users_at_subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Weird Behaviour: Files reverted that didn't show up in a status --
> no-ignore
>
> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 9:53 PM, <webster.brent_at_rogers.com> wrote:
> > We are running VisualSVN 1.9.3 server on a Windows box and a user's
> > workspace is on a Centos6.5 Linux box.
> > He had just done a "svn update" and the build failed. No conflicts as far
> > as I can tell. The "svn status" showed the build artifacts and his modified
> > files. As a suggestion, he would "svn revert -R ." all his changes. During
> > the revert, it showed numerous other SVN element(cpp & h) files being
> > reverted that he never touched and the "svn status --no-ignore" never
> > showed. We tried reproducing it but no luck.
> >
> > I'm in the process of switching over a bunch of "old", hardened Clearcase
> > folks to SVN so this little weirdness is never good to see.
>
> Would still be unexpected / weird, but: is it possible that those
> files were not really changed, but that 'revert' simply generated
> unnecessary notifications (showing 'reverted file X' for files that
> weren't really changed)?
>
> You didn't mention the version of svn client. Maybe it's a
> notification bug in the client that's already fixed?
One known case of this would be if some files were not writable. svn revert will restore writability/non writability based on whether a local lock is owned and/or svn:needs-lock is set, while status doesn't report this as a modification.
Bert
Received on 2016-03-03 11:08:11 CET