[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: bug or a feature :)

From: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 May 2015 22:49:50 -0500

On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 8:07 PM, Scott Aron Bloom <scott_at_towel42.com> wrote:
> So I noticed something..
>
>
>
> We use svn:externals quite a bit, using the format
>
> -r 1234 ^/externals/XXXX lcldr
>
>
>
> And it works just fine, we never moved to the “new” format of
> ^/externals/XXXX_at_1234
>
>
>
> However, recently, we found that in restructuring one of our externals
> directory, which caused XXXX to go away, svn up fails, saying it cant find
> the external. However switching to the @1234 format it works fine.
>
>
>
> Is this a known issue?

It is not an issue - they just mean different things - see 'peg
revisions' in the documentation. path_at_rev means go back to the
revision, find what was at the path. -r rev path means look at the
path in the head revision, and back up to the specified revision
number in that object's history. If there have been deletions/moves
they may be different things. Usually path_at_rev is what you expect.

-- 
   Les Mikesell
      lesmikesell_at_gmail.com
Received on 2015-05-07 05:50:54 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.