[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: put_xlate_handle_node exception

From: Philip Martin <philip.martin_at_wandisco.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 16:30:16 +0100

Kevin Radke <kmradke_at_gmail.com> writes:

> I'm using --disable-nonportable-atomics and apr 1.5.1 compiled with gcc
> 4.4.7.
> httpd 2.2.29 is built with mpm=worker.

Do you have a particular reason for using --disable-nonportable-atomics?
I suspect it leads to code that is not used as often and thus less well
tested. Perhaps try building apr without that setting.

> make check in svn gives:
> Summary of test results:
> 1948 tests PASSED
> 58 tests SKIPPED
> 31 tests XFAILED (1 WORK-IN-PROGRESS)
> SUMMARY: All tests successful.

The APR regression tests probably exercise the atomic code more than the
Subversion regression tests.

-- 
Philip Martin | Subversion Committer
WANdisco // *Non-Stop Data*
Received on 2015-04-15 17:32:16 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.