Here is some more info:
First I show the results of the svnversion, showing the mixed revision.
Then I do a svn merge (with -allow-mixed-revisions) and get the E195020 error
Then I do an svn up
Then another svnversion still showing the mixed revision
Then finally the merge showing the problem still exists..
Scott
$ svnversion
28594:29395S
scott_at_Vader ~/sb/bps/9.0.29202
$ svn merge --allow-mixed-revisions ^/branches/vijay/vhdlBitWidthFix_1 .
svn: E195020: Cannot merge into mixed-revision working copy [28594:29395]; try updating first
$ svn up
Updating '.':
Fetching external item into 'UI\nlview':
External at revision 26116.
Fetching external item into 'verific':
External at revision 29173.
Fetching external item into 'tcl':
Fetching external item into 'tcl\Install':
External at revision 23404.
At revision 28171.
Fetching external item into 'gmock':
External at revision 11153.
Fetching external item into 'qtiocompressor':
External at revision 29045.
Fetching external item into 'Licensing':
External at revision 28829.
Fetching external item into 'tcllib':
External at revision 23595.
Fetching external item into 'Prerequisites':
External at revision 28594.
Fetching external item into 'libicu':
External at revision 28899.
Fetching external item into 'libxcb':
External at revision 28929.
Fetching external item into 'Installation\FPGALibraries':
External at revision 29142.
Fetching external item into 'UI\QtGraphVizLib\libcgraphviz':
External at revision 28492.
At revision 29395.
$ svnversion
28594:29395S
$ svn merge --allow-mixed-revisions ^/branches/vijay/vhdlBitWidthFix_1 .
svn: E195020: Cannot merge into mixed-revision working copy [28594:29395]; try updating first
From: Scott Aron Bloom [mailto:scott_at_towel42.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2015 6:46 AM
To: Johan Corveleyn
Cc: users_at_subversion.apache.org
Subject: RE: Issue in svn E195020
Sorry, I misunderstood your question. Svn up succeeds but does not fix th3 svn merge issue.
I'll look at the stack overflow issue since we do have a bunch of externals.
~~Scott
-------- Original message --------
From: Johan Corveleyn <jcorvel_at_gmail.com<mailto:jcorvel_at_gmail.com>>
Date:03/31/2015 02:29 (GMT-08:00)
To: Scott Aron Bloom <scott_at_towel42.com<mailto:scott_at_towel42.com>>
Cc: users_at_subversion.apache.org<mailto:users_at_subversion.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Issue in svn E195020
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 2:56 AM, Scott Aron Bloom <scott_at_towel42.com<mailto:scott_at_towel42.com>> wrote:
>
>
>
> ~~Scott
>
> -------- Original message --------
> From: Johan Corveleyn <jcorvel_at_gmail.com<mailto:jcorvel_at_gmail.com>>
> Date:03/30/2015 12:48 (GMT-08:00)
> To: Scott Aron Bloom <scott_at_towel42.com<mailto:scott_at_towel42.com>>
> Cc: users_at_subversion.apache.org<mailto:users_at_subversion.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: Issue in svn E195020
>
>
>> Its has been common, that after the merge, if another merge is attempted
>> we
>> get the E195020 error, (cannot merge into mixed-revision), a simple
>>
>> svn up
>>
>> Fixes the issue, however lately, the svn up fails, and the E195020
>> continues.
>>
>
> Why does svn up fail? Error message? It would be interesting to
> address this first, because merging into a uniform revision working
> copy is still the recommended workflow.
> =
> I get error E195020 every time.
You said "svn up fails". Does 'svn up' give an error message then? I
find it hard to believe that 'svn up' would say:
svn: E195020: Cannot merge into mixed-revision working copy [X:Y];
try updating first"
So does 'svn up' really fail (i.e. gives an error)? If so, can you
please copy-paste its error message?
Or do you mean that 'svn up' succeeds, but it doesn't fix the problem
of the mixed-rev working copy?
If the latter, maybe your problem is similar to this report on
Stackoverflow (related to a file external, which apparently makes svn
see the working copy as mixed rev -- and the file external doesn't get
updated to the uniform revision):
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5046075/unfixable-mixed-revision-working-copy-in-svn
--
Johan
Received on 2015-04-01 03:37:43 CEST