[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: issues after updating one client to version 1.8

From: Joan Baiges <jbaiges_at_cimne.upc.edu>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2015 23:03:40 +0100

Dear Johan,
Thank you for your response, I will check the server side error log .
Kind regards,
Joan
El dia 27/03/2015 22:33, "Johan Corveleyn" <jcorvel_at_gmail.com> va escriure:

> On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 10:11 PM, Johan Corveleyn <jcorvel_at_gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 8:05 PM, Joan Baiges <jbaiges_at_cimne.upc.edu>
> wrote:
> >> Dear all,
> >> We are using svn 1.6 as a server, and most of my teammates are also
> using
> >> svn 1.6. I recently upgraded to 1.8 and after a merge operation from my
> 1.8
> >> client several issues have arised:
> >> - My colleagues (svn client 1.6) are unable to merge branches
> >> getting errors of the type of:
> >> svn: El servidor envió un valor de devolución inesperado (500 Internal
> >> Server Error) en respuesta al requerimiento PROPFIND para
> >>
> «/p/femuss/trunk/Femuss/Tests/test24/cupula3d3.gid/results/cupula3d30.nsi.sol»
> >> svn: Error leyendo la respuesta almacenada temporalmente al pedido
> REPORT
> >>
> >> - I (svn client 1.8) can merge properly, but the merge operation is
> really
> >> slow (long waiting time before merge starts, slow file merge
> afterwards).
> >>
> >> Is this a known issue? Are there any fixes?
> >> Thank you for your help.
> >
> > There should be an error in the server-side logs corresponding to that
> > '500 Internal Server Error' that the 1.6 clients get. Can you send us
> > the error from the server logs?
>
> I just spotted the following in the 1.7 release notes, in the "New
> feature compatibility table" [1]:
>
> [[[
> Feature: reduced subtree mergeinfo recording
> Minimum Client: 1.7
> Minimum Server: any
> Minimum Repository: any
> Notes: If both pre-1.7 clients and 1.7 clients are used to perform
> merges to the same branch, the pre-1.7 clients may experience slower
> merge performance.
> ]]]
>
> Maybe your problem is related to huge amounts of subtree mergeinfo?
>
> [1]
> http://subversion.apache.org/docs/release-notes/1.7.html#new-feature-compatibility-table
>
> --
> Johan
>
Received on 2015-03-27 23:04:07 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.