Le 10/02/2015 14:14, jleroux_at_apache.org a écrit :
> Le 10/02/2015 12:36, Stefan Sperling a écrit :
>> On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 12:04:24PM +0100, jleroux_at_apache.org wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Today I tried to update a custom OFBiz working copy to a specific revision and got this
>>>
>>> C:\********>svn up -r1634839
>>> Mise à jour de '.' :
>>> U hot-deploy
>>> Removed external 'hot-deploy\core'
>>> Removed external 'hot-deploy\****po'
>>> Left local modifications as 'hot-deploy\***po'
>>> Removed external 'hot-deploy\********-theme'
>>> Removed external 'hot-deploy\********hh'
>>> Removed external 'hot-deploy\********comlead'
>>> Removed external 'hot-deploy\********accnt'
>>> Removed external 'hot-deploy\********common'
>>> Left local modifications as 'hot-deploy\********common'
>>> Removed external 'hot-deploy\productconfig'
>>> Left local modifications as 'hot-deploy\productconfig'
>>> Actualisé à la révision 1634839.
>>>
>>> C:\********>
>>> Anybody an idea (did not find anything clear in Google)?
>> Have the relevant svn:externals properties changed?
>> If someone removed an external definition from the property (or removed the
>> property entirely) then this behaviour would be entirely expected.
>>
>> If you need more help, please clearly state which URL you checked out and
>> which revision numbers were involved so that others can reproduce your problem.
>>
> Thanks Stefan,
>
> Nothing was changed. I was (unconsciously) hoping that
> svn up -r***
> would have the same behaviour than
> svn up
> regarding externals (it updates them also, of course their HEADs is at different revisions)
>
> I can live with Andrew's solution :)
>
> Jacques
Stefan,
Actually I think youy are right. I'm using a 500 lines py script which was given to me and I had no time time to review yet. I guess it's doing
something with the externals definitions...
Thanks
Jacques
Received on 2015-02-10 16:43:25 CET