[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svnadmin pack vs hotcopy --incremental

From: Stefan Sperling <stsp_at_elego.de>
Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2014 01:58:12 +0200

On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 03:17:06PM -0400, Myron A. Semack wrote:
> I have an FSFS repository that is backed up nightly with svnadmin hotcopy --incremental. It has just crossed the 80000 revisions mark, and it has never been packed. I would like to run svnadmin pack on this repo.
>
>
>
> After I run svandmin pack, will the incremental hotcopy still work? Will the hotcopy mirror the packing in the backup copy of the repo? Or do I need to do a full hotcopy after packing the live repo?
>
>
>
> If I schedule svnadmin pack to happen at regular intervals (e.g. weekly), how should I change my nightly backup strategy?
>
>
>
> I just want to make sure I do this right so I don't corrupt anything.
>
>
>
> For reference, this is a Windows server, running SVN 1.8.8, and the repo is at FSFS version 5.
>
>
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Myron A. Semack
>

If you don't pack and hotcopy concurrently, it's perfectly safe.

If you pack and hotcopy concurrently, it's almost safe.
There is a known problem with concurrent hotcopy and pack, the fix for which
isn't released yet, I believe. Details here: http://svn.apache.org/r1605633
Received on 2014-08-02 01:58:45 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.