[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Subversion Windows Performance compared to Linux

From: Philip Martin <philip.martin_at_wandisco.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 05:14:28 +0100

Branko Čibej <brane_at_wandisco.com> writes:

> We made a conscious decision
> to design a working copy format that's faster than the old format could
> ever have been and can better support new features (such as client-side
> move tracking), at the expense of poorer performance on a remote
> filesystem that is, when you get right down to it, a 30-year-old
> dinosaur that was never designed for the kind of use that people these
> days seem to assume it can support.

The new working copy format in 1.7 had a speed issue with recursive
commit on NFS but that has been fixed in later clients. Use 1.8 or 1.9
and the new format is faster than the old format.

-- 
Philip Martin | Subversion Committer
WANdisco // *Non-Stop Data*
Received on 2014-04-29 06:15:17 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.