[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Subversion Windows Performance compared to Linux

From: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 10:06:44 -0500

On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 11:58 PM, Branko Čibej <brane_at_wandisco.com> wrote:
> >
> "Mostly read-only" would be a pretty good description of mature
> project maintenance - which in my experience is where most developer
> time goes.
>
>
> You're confusing the contents of versioned files with working copy metadata.
> The latter is never mostly read-only; even a simple "svn update" that
> doesn't change any working file can modify lots of metadata, and this is
> where locking is involved.

Will the subversion performance issue affect local storage that is
exported via nfs or just the clients mounting it remotely?

-- 
   Les Mikesell
     lesmikesell_at_gmail.com
Received on 2014-04-28 17:07:20 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.