[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Subversion Windows Performance compared to Linux

From: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell_at_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 16:02:14 -0500

On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 3:26 PM, Branko Čibej <brane_at_wandisco.com> wrote:
>>
> If you absolutely must put your working copies or repositories on non-local
> storage, you should use a SAN with a real, multi-homed distributed
> filesystem. Anything else is half-baked, at least as far as data integrity
> is concerned.

Working copies are supposed to be throwaway things that can always be
fixed to the last commit by the server. Why wouldn't you want to use
something fast, cheap, and highly buffered for that, even if it is
half baked?

-- 
   Les Mikesell
     lesmikesell_at_gmail.com
Received on 2014-04-25 23:02:47 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.