Florian Ludwig said the following, on 16-04-14, 1:13 PM:
> Hi,
>
> this topic was raised several times in the past - the answers range
> from "will be better/solved in the next version 1.7" or "it is due to
> ntfs vs ext3/4" or it's the AV, network setup or the Windows file
> indexing service. After disabling all those and running a test
> checkout on Linux and Windows on the same machine I still get a result
> of Linux being 7.3x times faster. Any ideas why?
>
> Commands used to test:
> * Linux: $ time svn co svn://10.0.0.1/test <http://10.0.0.1/test> >
> /dev/null
> * Windows: PS Measure-Command { svn co svn://10.0.0.1/test
> <http://10.0.0.1/test> > $null }
>
> Results (tests run twice, better result taken):
> * Linux on ext4 (journaling enabled): 1m 16s
> * Linux on NTFS*: 3m 29s
> * Windows 7 on NTFS*: 9m 19s
I can confirm this results (they were even more significant when I
tested it, like 10x gap easily).
And this has nothing to do with windows or anything underlying, it's
just not efficient software design.
The reason for such conslution is that when you copy repo data locally,
its almost equially fast on windows w/ linux.
--Roman
Received on 2014-04-25 03:35:21 CEST