> One thing I recall about 1.7, is that virtually none of the changes did
> anything that really sped up checkout. So that is probably the worst thing
> to be testing with. If all you care about is checkout, then there was
> really little done in 1.7 or 1.8 to speed it up. Most of the big
> performance wins in 1.7 came in other areas. For example, update got a lot
> faster on Windows on working copies with lots of folders because the time
> to "lock" the working copy got a lot slower.
>
commit / update seems slower as well but I don't have any numbers - I
decided to test checkout since it is easier tested (just a single command).
>
> During the run-up to 1.7, I wrote some benchmarks that were being used to
> compare overall performance of a lot of operations on a lot of different
> scenarios:
>
> https://ctf.open.collab.net/sf/projects/csvn/
>
> Something like this would be a better way to compare performance between
> different versions or the impact of different tweaks on performance. For
> example, you could run it with and without Anti-Virus enabled to see what
> impact your tool has in performance.
>
For the test I had:
* AV deactivated
* IPv6 deactivated
* Windows file indexing service deactivated
* Windows auto updates disabled
* Windows Media Player * Service(s) deactivated
I was looking for the fasted "base line" to archive - before activating
anything like av or moving to tortoise gui. I will look into doing some
commit/update benchmarks / look into csvn.
Received on 2014-04-22 16:37:38 CEST