[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Subversion Windows Performance compared to Linux

From: Florian Ludwig <vierzigundzwei_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 16:37:03 +0200

> One thing I recall about 1.7, is that virtually none of the changes did
> anything that really sped up checkout. So that is probably the worst thing
> to be testing with. If all you care about is checkout, then there was
> really little done in 1.7 or 1.8 to speed it up. Most of the big
> performance wins in 1.7 came in other areas. For example, update got a lot
> faster on Windows on working copies with lots of folders because the time
> to "lock" the working copy got a lot slower.
>

commit / update seems slower as well but I don't have any numbers - I
decided to test checkout since it is easier tested (just a single command).

>
> During the run-up to 1.7, I wrote some benchmarks that were being used to
> compare overall performance of a lot of operations on a lot of different
> scenarios:
>
> https://ctf.open.collab.net/sf/projects/csvn/
>
> Something like this would be a better way to compare performance between
> different versions or the impact of different tweaks on performance. For
> example, you could run it with and without Anti-Virus enabled to see what
> impact your tool has in performance.
>

For the test I had:
 * AV deactivated
 * IPv6 deactivated
 * Windows file indexing service deactivated
 * Windows auto updates disabled
 * Windows Media Player * Service(s) deactivated

I was looking for the fasted "base line" to archive - before activating
anything like av or moving to tortoise gui. I will look into doing some
commit/update benchmarks / look into csvn.
Received on 2014-04-22 16:37:38 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.