First, thanks for your answer, and sorry my late answer
On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 03:05:28PM -0800, Ben Reser wrote:
> On 2/3/14, 2:26 PM, Marc MERLIN wrote:
> > On my personal system, I got a new svn and as prompted by "your repo is
> > too old", upgraded it to the new format (svn 1.7.13).
>
> You mean working copy, there is no such message about repositories. We support
> repositories all the way back to 1.0.
Yes, I did. After working with svn, p4, and git, I tend to confuse the
terms a bit, sorry.
> It's no longer supported for a working copy to cross file systems.
> Unfortunately, doesn't look like we documented that fact in our release notes:
> http://subversion.apache.org/docs/release-notes/1.7.html#wc-ng
So be it. Maybe it would be good for svn upgrade to notice this and
fail, or at least print a warning?
> This has caused some issues on Windows as well where permissions become
> problematic because the files are not made under the same directory as their
> destination. So it's possible we might change this in the future. But that
> does nothing to help you right now.
Indeed :) but I appreciate the info nonetheless.
> > I don't really want to rebuild my entire svn checkout in 7 different ones (one
> > per filesystem), not counting that I'd have to manually fix what svn state that
> > isn't synced on each of my client checkouts.
> >
> > What are my options?
> > 1) revert to svn 1.6 but I don't think I can revert my svn repo state
> > without going back to backups, I'm assuming it's a one way upgrade.
>
> Before starting it would be a good idea to take a backup of the files if you
> have concerns about local modifications.
Sound advise.
> Note what revision you're at in your working copy with svnversion (I'll assume
> $WC is your $WC root from here on out)
> svnversion $WC
Good idea, but:
legolas:/var/local/scr# svnversion
svn: E155037: Previous operation has not finished; run 'cleanup' if it was interrupted
legolas:/var/local/scr# svnversion /
svn: E155037: Previous operation has not finished; run 'cleanup' if it was interrupted
> Hopefully that's not a mixed revision range, if it is you may have some issues
> with the following. If it's locally modified that should be ok.
>
> Remove the .svn working copy metadata directory:
> rm -rf $WC/.svn
>
> Run the checkout again with 1.6 client where $REV is the revision you got from
> svnversion and $URL is the $URL to your repo:
> svn-1.6 checkout --force -r $REV $URL $WC
>
> You'll get a lot of E lines (which is the client saying the file already
> exists). It'll still have your local modifications.
Thanks for the tip. I'll try some of that on one client, but on the
others I probably
> However, we no longer support 1.6, so you probably want to upgrade to 1.7/1.8
> at some point or you're going to be stuck in the past.
I know, I lose, I'll have to rebuild my entire system. Maybe I'll just
switch away from svn considering how much work it'll be anyway.
> This (splitting your working copy) is probably your best bet. However, to be
> honest with you this was never a task to which Subversion was made for. I'm
Apparently not. I used to do this with cvs, then upgraded to svn, now
maybe to something else. I understand that my use case is clearly not a
majority so I'll deal.
> guessing you're already using some sort of wrapper to deal with permissions.
actually I don't because I only check config files and scripts that do
not need special owners or permissions.
> So it seems to me you need to extend the wrapper to deal with multiple working
> copies on each file system and keeping them in sync. More than likely you need
> to request the latest revision from the server (1.7/1.8: use svn info $URL and
> pull out the Revision: field; 1.9 will have svn youngest for this purpose).
> Then run svn up -r $REV on each working copy.
>
> > 3) other :)
>
> I don't see any other choices.
Thanks for laying down the options, it definitely helps me plan about
what I should do next.
Thanks,
Marc
--
"A mouse is a device used to point at the xterm you want to type in" - A.S.R.
Microsoft is to operating systems ....
.... what McDonalds is to gourmet cooking
Home page: http://marc.merlins.org/ | PGP 1024R/763BE901
Received on 2014-02-14 05:10:12 CET