Re: SQLite appears to be compiled without large file support

On Dec 4, 2013, at 7:54 PM, Adam Daughterson <Adam.Daughterson_at_dothill.com> wrote:

> The really interesting part is that the db file is only 119k, so that's nice and weird...
>
> me_at_here:myThing$ ls -alh .svn
> total 144K
> drwxr-xr-x 4 adaughterson adaughterson 4.0K 2013-12-02 15:42 .
> drwxr-xr-x 9 adaughterson adaughterson 4.0K 2013-12-02 15:41 ..
> -rw-r--r-- 1 adaughterson adaughterson 3 2013-12-02 15:41 entries
> -rw-r--r-- 1 adaughterson adaughterson 3 2013-12-02 15:41 format
> drwxr-xr-x 97 adaughterson adaughterson 4.0K 2013-12-02 15:41 pristine
> drwxr-xr-x 5 adaughterson adaughterson 4.0K 2013-12-02 15:41 tmp
> -rw-r--r-- 1 adaughterson adaughterson 119K 2013-12-02 15:42 wc.db
>
> Any help is appreciated.

Repeat adding -s to ls. I think that will list the position of EOF. I think you have a sparse file which physically occupies 119k but has massive holes which have yet to be assigned disk blocks.

--
David Kelly N4HHE, dkelly_at_HiWAAY.net
============================================================
Whom computers would destroy, they must first drive mad.