> On Nov 16, 2013, at 6:06 AM, Andreas Mohr <andi_at_lisas.de> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 04:29:13AM -0500, Geoff Rowell wrote:
>>
>>> On Nov 16, 2013, at 2:10 AM, Vladislav Javadov <vapaamies_at_yandex.ru> wrote:
>>>
>>> rm programs/develop/fasm/tags
>>> rm programs/games/mine/tags
>>> rm programs/games/snake/tags
>>
>> Each command argument must be on a separate line:
>>
>> rm
>> programs/develop/fasm/tags
>> rm
>> programs/games/mine/tags
>> rm
>> programs/games/snake/tags
>
> So, does that mean that svnmucc has single-arg support only?
> Cause given this example, on the syntax side there's nothing
> that would indicate that a new command is following,
> rather than further options to the existing command...
> (unless "rm" is one of the commands
> which are specially recognized as a known-supported command)
>
> Sorry for my critique (and thank you for your help!) - just sayin'...
>
svnmucc commands have a fixed number of arguments. Use "svnmucc --help" to see the valid commands.
- Geoff
Received on 2013-11-16 14:04:01 CET