Re: svn delete removes read-only files

On 14.11.2013 21:54, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 14.11.2013 21:44, Philip Martin wrote:
>> Branko Čibej <brane_at_wandisco.com> writes:
>>
>>> On 14.11.2013 19:24, Rick Varney wrote:
>>>> We are currently on Subversion 1.6.6.
>>>> What do you think? Any alternatives I have not considered? Should I
>>>> open a feature request for this?
>>> I disagree with the behaviour change because it makes 'svn delete' in
>>> the presence of svn:needs-lock behave exactly opposite to every other
>>> command. IMO, it's quite enough to simply fix the bug where we try to
>>> change the permissions on a non-existent local path.
>>>
>>> So I suggest you file a bug for that, not for the behaviour change.
>> We won't fix this in 1.6 and 1.8 is already fixed:
>>
>> $ svn rm wc/A/f
>> D wc/A/f
>> $ svn st wc/A/f
>> D wc/A/f
>> $ svn lock wc/A/f
>> 'f' locked by user 'pm'.
>> $ svn st wc/A/f
>> D K wc/A/f
>
> Yes, I was just going to say. I added test cases for this on trunk,
> and they passed; I've just been running them on 1.8, where they pass
> as well.
>
> In other words, upgrading to 1.8 will fix the issue, and in the
> meantime, ask your users to either revert the delete first (i.e., 'svn
> revert file; svn lock file; svn rm file; svn commit', or to use the
> URL in the 'svn lock' command.

And here's the related issue:

http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4304

-- 
Branko Čibej | Director of Subversion
WANdisco // Non-Stop Data
e. brane_at_wandisco.com