On 24.10.2013 14:08, Attila Nagy wrote:
> On 10/22/13 09:56, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> On 22.10.2013 07:13, Branko ?ibej wrote:
>>> On 21.10.2013 18:16, Attila Nagy wrote:
>>>> On 10/15/2013 08:09 AM, Attila Nagy wrote:
>>>>> I store OS images in svn, so I need to record file permissions and
>>>>> ownership. For this, I use properties.
>>>>> But svn changes real file permissions:
>>>> OK, long story short. Isn't this a security issue?
>>> No, because Subversion does not promise to restore original file
>>> permissions, and therefore you shouldn't rely on it to do so.
>>>
>>> There used to be a Unix-specific patch for storing and restoring the
>>> permissions bits, but it does not appear to be mantained.
> As Thorsten has pointed out, this is a different case. BTW, I have a
> similar solution, like contrib/asvn, but the current operation of svn
> makes it impossible/very hard to make it work, because it screws up
> real file permissions on each commits.
Yes, that's a valid point. Subversion will possibly write the file
and/or change permissions on commit in two cases, I think:
* The file has the svn:needs-lock property set, and has to be made
read-only after commit; or,
* The file contains keywords, which have to be updated (e.g., author
and revision change after a commit).
-- Brane
--
Branko Čibej | Director of Subversion
WANdisco // Non-Stop Data
e. brane_at_wandisco.com
Received on 2013-10-24 22:08:56 CEST