[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Reverting an ADD status file after an update tree conflict deletes the file

From: Johan Corveleyn <jcorvel_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 21:20:36 +0200

On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 9:08 PM, Bob Archer <Bob.Archer_at_amsi.com> wrote:
> Bert,
>
>
>
> But, this isn’t a merge it is an update. If I revert the add I lose all the
> changes I made in step 1 of my steps below. I might have made a few hundred
> changes. Granted, I probably shouldn’t do the revert without copying the
> file off somewhere… but those local modifications I made are NOWHERE in this
> case and can’t be recovered if my local copy of the file is deleted.
>

But, but ... isn't 'revert' always a lossy operation? If you revert a
locally modified file you also lose your local modifications.

OK, if you revert a normal 'add', svn will keep the local file. But as
Bert said, if you revert an 'add with history' (A +), which seems to
be the case here, svn will just throw away whatever is there, exactly
like when you revert a Modified file.

There is no "revert only the add, but keep the local mods" operation.

-- 
Johan
Received on 2013-10-14 21:21:32 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.