[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: libsvn_ra_serf/util.c: undefined reference to serf_bucket_request_set_CL [1.8.1][1.8.3][WORKAROUND]

From: Ben Reser <ben_at_reser.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 21:20:30 -0700

On 9/8/13 4:12 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> This is why you either update a system version that is high enough, or you use
> the "get-deps.sh" to pull down versions locally and compile them statically.
> I've been publishing up-to-date get-deps.sh, slightly more consistent in layout
> and up-to-date, at
> https://github.com/nkadel/subversion-1.8.x-srpm/blob/master/get-deps.sh.

He does have a legitimate complaint, the problem is that Debian's serf isn't
new enough and our configure should be complaining.

> Can we possibly get that updated get-deps.sh into the main code line?

Make a patch and submit it along with a commit message explaining the reasoning
for your changes.

Some comments from looking at your script now:

1) The nested command substitutions in setting the SQLITE need to be broken up
to be compatible with POSIX shells. You should avoid using $() since there are
some shells that don't implement this (despite the fact that it's in the POSIX
standard).

2) What's the motivation for reordering stuff all over the place. It just seem
gratutitous and it doesn't really matter what order get-deps.sh downloads
things. What it does achieve is to make your differences very difficult to
actually see.

3) As far as I know the newest version of APR iconv is 1.2.1, your script is
defaulting to 1.2.6

4) Is there some particular reason to want SQLITE 3.7.17 versus 3.7.15.1? We
don't typically bump version numbers once a 1.x.0 has been released unless
there's a specific reason to.

5) There's no reason to download gtest since nothing actually uses it yet.

6) What's the point of all the || return 1? The existing test when using user
provided deps list is to show the usage if someone tries to use a deps name we
don't have implemented. I mean I can see the value in checking that the
commands actually suceeded but when you just run the script with no command it
doesn't do anything with that return and when there is an error it just prints
the usage, which is hugely confusing.
Received on 2013-09-12 06:21:07 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.